Biden Signs Social Security Fairness Act Into Law

Jan 6, 2025 / By Elaine Floyd, CFP ®

On January 5 President Biden signed into law the Social Security Fairness Act eliminating the WEP and GPO for clients who worked in jobs not covered by Social Security. The passage and signing of the Act was a feel-good moment for politicians, who hailed it as a way for everyone to get their “fair share” and be able to “retire with economic security and dignity,” even if there was a certain amount of misrepresentation in the media implying that the workers who had been subject to the WEP had paid into the system their entire careers. This, as we know, is not true. A person who paid into Social Security for 30 years or more was never subject to the WEP. It was only those who had worked in noncovered jobs that DIDN’T pay into Social Security whose benefits based on other, covered earnings were reduced. In any case, the time for debate is over. The WEP and GPO have been repealed, and now it’s time to get the word out to affected clients.

It is our understanding that SSA will make the adjustments automatically back to January 2024. So your WEP clients need do nothing except wait and watch for communications and payments from SSA.

The GPO is a bit different. SSA says that if a person had applied and been denied spousal or survivor benefits due to the GPO, these applications would be revisited and benefits would be paid, also retroactive to January 2024. However, it wouldn’t hurt to follow up, once the dust clears and SSA has started making the adjustments. The people you really want to get the word out to are those who never applied for spousal or survivor benefits because they assumed they wouldn’t be eligible for them. I know that many cases have come through our Software and our Q & A forum where it was clear that a spouse would not be entitled to any spousal or survivor benefits because two-thirds of their pension amount exceeded the benefit. Now, with the repeal of the GPO all these spouses will become entitled to those benefits without regard to their pension. If you have any of these clients you should contact them and encourage them to apply for their spousal or survivor benefits. If entitlement existed back to January 2024, they should note this on their application. Unfortunately, that’s as far back as the new law goes. Anyone denied spousal or survivor benefits (or paid a reduced amount) prior to January 2024 will not be able to recoup those benefits.

The client presentation pertaining to the WEP and GPO has been revised. You’ll see it on the Savvy Presentations page. We are working on a new client reprint article and will have it available shortly, along with revisions to the “What’s New with Social Security: Seven (now Eight) Topics to Watch in 2025.”

As director of retirement and life planning for Horsesmouth, Elaine Floyd helps advisors better serve their clients by understanding the practical and technical aspects of retirement income planning. A former wirehouse broker, she earned her CFP designation in 1986.

 

Comments


How does this impact the Railroad Retirement benefits? It does not seem to be addressed in the bill.

According to the RRB, it will affect people eligible for Tier 1 benefits. In other words, a person who worked long enough in a covered job to qualify for Social Security benefits will not have their Social Security reduced by the receipt of a Railroad Tier 1 pension. It does not mean that their Railroad earnings will now count as Social Security-covered earnings. I'm afraid some people are interpreting it this way. See this from the RRB.

Elaine, This is great news. The example below fits many of our clients. How do you run this scenario in the software program if the higher earning spouse has begun claiming at Age 62 and the lower earning spouse, who is Age 63 is receiving a Pension from a Teacher's Retirement? Is it correct that she must wait until Age 67 to claim? The retired teacher is not eligible for SS based on only having 27 credits.

She does not have to wait until she turns FRA to claim her spousal benefit. She can claim it anytime between now and age 67. (If she takes it now she'll get less than 50%.) You can run this in the software. Just enter their PIAs (zero for her) and click on Create Scenario. Show him already claiming, and enter a claiming age for her. It will show her spousal benefit.

If higher earning spouse A is collecting on their own record and lower earning spouse B was a postal worker subject to the GPO and has a very low SS benefit on their own record from other employment, is spouse B entitled to any spousal benefit? My clients keep telling me that lower earning spouse B is not entitled to the higher spousal benefit. Does the new ACT change anything for spouse B's ability to file for a higher spousal benefit? Thank you.

Yes, in fact Spouse B's situation was the main impetus for the new law. With Spouse B qualifying for little or no Social Security on their own work record, they may now claim a spousal benefit of up to 50% of Spouse A's PIA and it will not be reduced due to the receipt of a pension (or lump sum in your client's case) from a noncovered job. You can brush up on spousal rules by reading Chapter 6 of your FA Guide. Educate clients by presenting the Women's or Couples presentations. Offer to analyze claiming options using the Savvy Social Security Planning Software.

P.S. on my last question - Spouse B cashed out the pension balance and does not receive a pension.

IMPORTANT NOTICE
This material is provided exclusively for use by individuals with an active license to the Savvy Social Security Planning Program. Use of this material is subject to the Social Security Planning Program Agreement and applicable copyright laws. Unauthorized use, reproduction or distribution of this material is a violation of federal law and punishable by civil and criminal penalty. This material is furnished “as is” without warranty of any kind. Its accuracy and completeness is not guaranteed and all warranties express or implied are hereby excluded.

© 2025 Horsesmouth, LLC. All Rights Reserved.